The semester I attended at KI consisted of psychiatry, neurology, ENT and ophtalmology. I liked the composition of the semester and I thought the schedule in general was well-organized and planned. The curricula and what was expected of the students was always very clear. The teachers were all good, and always had the perspective of what we needed to know for our exams/early careers in mind. My impression was that the students have a big influence on the studies and that their evaluations are taken to mind by the school.
I think the biggest difference between my school in Copenhagen and KI was how well-organized KI is and how much of the education was mandatory. Almost everything during the semester was mandatory, in copenhagen it is not. Part of me thought that it was a bit too much, I believe that grown medical students should be able to take responsibility for their own education and attend what they personally think that they benefit from. Meaning that if you would rather study a topic on my own instead of attending seminars I think that should be up to me.
On the other hand, with the clinical education and the seminars being mandatory the teachers were always sure that the students would show up. And therefore I think they tried harder to make the lessons worthwhile and the clinical education kept a very high standard. The way that the wards booked patients especially for the students and how you received immediate feedback impressed me and was very valuable.
Overall, I was very happy with the studies at KI. The school makes it easy for its students to sort out the essentials, and at the same time simplify the practicalities around the studies so that there is time and energy for learning beyond the curriculum covering the learning goals for the exams.