I think the relationship between me, as a student, and my supervisors were excellent. My supervisors were very helpful finding instructions and relevant literature. Slowly, I was guidet to perform multiple independent tasks related to patient care.
One of the things I learned was that there is much focus on safety and control in correlation to both patients and health professionals, for example safe medication dosage, instructions and flowcharts for everything to minimize eventual mistakes. It is also my impression that the approach and tone to the patients are more soft and the patients are more involved in their own treatment, than I am used to in Denmark. I think that was my “take-home-lessons”.
I discovered that that the Swedish intensive-care-nurse- education is an academic full-time study unlike the Danish education.
In Denmark you are employed at a ICU-department, while studying, so it’s (as earlier mentioned) more like a course. For four months you alternate between working one week and go to school the next week. Afterwards, one has to pass an exam to be accepted at the clinical education. The clinical education takes place in another ICU for six weeks and after this, one spend six weeks at a recovery room. Finally, one has to write an assignment on a patient-related clinical problem. The combination of working one week and studying another week has the advantage that one get to use the new theory in clinical practice. The disadvantage is offhand that the Danish nurses seems less committed to study than the Swedish nurses, because one has to work and study at the same time. The impact of this is that one doesn’t have the time to reflect.
At KI/THIVA I had one day a week to reflect and go to the library and study. At the Danish education one has to use the sparetime to reflect and study.
So, from my point of view, I liked the Swedish way of studying better than the Danish way of studying my education.