It was very interesting and educational to experience a different study environment. Overall I liked the relationship between students and teachers/supervisors as most of the teachers/supervisors affiliated with the courses were very dedicated to the education of the students. A few of the supervising doctors that merely worked at some of the wards the students were placed at took no interest in our education at all though so it might be worth reconsidering placing student under the supervision of non-engaged doctors. I liked the balance between theory and clinical education as both parts are crucial in becoming good doctors. Starting out learning the basics through lectures and trying out the methods on fellow students proved a good method. However I wasn't impressed by the methods used during the clinical training. It seemed really inefficient to spend half a day only attending 1-2 patients and most often while being too inexperienced to handle the patients on our own. The principle of following a supervisor to meet a lot of patients and see a lot of diagnosis and professional handling of the patients in a short time before handling patients all on your own has previously provided me with a lot better learning experience, and my Swedish fellow students agreed and let me know that they also missed this more educational method that we were all used to from previous semesters.
In general I liked the environment at the courses and wards. I was very surprised by the relaxed atmosphere at the wards. I know "fika" is important but I still wonder how Swedish medical staff can complain about being stressed when a full ward can have morning "fika" together (or just time for "fika at all) and a lunch break so long that I grew impatient to get going again. Maybe this also contributed to the fact that I found that compared to back home fewer doctors seemed to be stressed by having to teach students and instead took their time to explain and were generally nice to us.
A negative surprise when it comes to the study environment was the impression I got that KI has another view on students than what I am used to. When it came to the structure and endless compulsory elements (that my Swedish classmates let me know was often the cheap solution by KI to make students attend the elements that was of too low quality or not relevant enough to make students attend out of free will instead of improving the quality or relevance of the elements) it didn't feel like an university environment as KI didn't seem to trust the students to be engaged in their studies and eager to learn as I am used to, but treated us a lot more like school-children with a lot of compulsory elements and documentation of participation. I'm still puzzled why KI treats its students like this and not like responsible adults who wants to learn all that they need in their future role as doctors.
The learning I gained during the exchange met my expectations. In addition to the specific subjects of the course, including theory, examination methods and experience with patients, I got to learn medical Swedish and the basics and working methods of the Swedish health system. This was exactly what I hoped for. And then there is always the odd things of being an exchange student like the fact that I actually learned more about Swedish legislation than treatment in psychiatry.
The biggest difference I noticed between the programme at KI and at my home university is the goal of the programme; what kind of doctors are they educating. While I'm used to striving to become a hospital doctor and struggling to learn the basics of all the specialities I was surprised to learn that the curriculum at KI is more focused on educating GPs. I would say that KI wasn't demanding the same level of knowledge within each subject as I am used to which came as a great surprise, as did the integrated GP perspective and GP clinic as I'm not used to mixing the specialities. Overall it was a quite interesting experience to gain a GP perspective, but I would also say that the exam felt a lot easier than the exams at my home university. Speaking of the exam I was also surprised (and a bit scared prior to the exam) by the very old-school style at KI. It was the first time through all levels of my education that I had to write an exam for hand and I had expected an university with a reputation like KI to meet the standard of my home university where all exams are written on computer. I was very pleased however, (especially due to the lack of dictionary and writing skills being one of the elements examined) that I was allowed to write the exam in my Scandinavian mother tongue instead of Swedish (as is supported by the Nordic cooperation) to avoid the additional pressure of writing in a foreign language when experiencing the KI examination method for the first time.
A very big issue in my case when it comes to study life, and the life as an exchange student in general, turned out to be transportation. I spent countless hours in the less-than-well-functioning public transport in Stockholm making me too exhausted to maintain much of a social life during weekdays. It came as a total surprise to get placed at the campus as far from my accommodation as possible, especially as I didn't even know of the risk of being placed anywhere but Solna campus prior to arrival and finding accommodation. It surprised me even more that I as an exchange student weren't allowed to prioritize between the sites as my Swedish fellow students were, and that after providing KI with the address of my accommodation I got placed at Huddinge campus for the full duration of my exchange as the only exchange student in my programme to be placed their for the full term and also the one living furthest away of Campus Huddinge as I was living North of town. I never got any explanation and all complaints about it were refused which felt like an unfair and discriminating treatment of me as an exchange student.