During the three and a half months at KI, I followed some theoretical courses and had a lot of clinical training were we sat treating patients under supervision. We followed the lectures in Swedish, which was no problem as I'm Danish. The teoretical standard was great and at the same time teaching had a good clinical relevance, which a liked a lot.
The teacher's were nice and friendly and always very helpful and ready to give competent guidance and assistance when needed.
Compared to my own university the lectures seemed to be more focused on clinical cases and informations that would be relevant in a clinical context. We often spend a lot of time analysing articles and listening to the results of various experiments.
The clinical teaching at my home university as arranged in the way that each group of students has their own teacher at the same clinical rotation every week. This gives some advantages, because there might be a better continuity, However sometimes the teacher might be sick or the treatment that you have to make is not excactly your teacher's specialty. In that way i think i prefer the swedish model even though is probably more expensive. It's nice always beeing able to consult a specialist and when there are more teacher's available your can choose the one that your feel more comfortable with. In our system you are sometimes stuck with a teacher that you don't get along with, which can be quite a drag over a longer period.
In the clinic many thing were done like we do them at home, but often there were also differences which often were very enlightening and great to learn. It's nice to get to see different ways of attacking the same problem.