I evaluated masters’ theses submissions in the
global health programme at KI. It was a unique experience as the system for
grading is very well-detailed, makes the process smooth and also transparent.
As part of the evaluation, I had the opportunity to be present for number of
thesis presentations and provide oral feedback apart from the written feedback
that I already submitted. Both these opportunities helped me understand the
quality of thesis at the global health programme. There are clear differences
in the kind of theses submissions that students submit at KI and my institute. This is probably to do with the way the respective
programmes are framed and each has its own advantages. I am very impressed with
the overall quality of the theses at global health programme as many of them of
the publishable quality. I am also impressed by how much students can accomplish
even without intense guidance from faculty. This could be probably because of internet
and other facilities available. This is clearly different from my institution
as students require intense supervision by faculty for their thesis. I was also part of a class on child health and
nutrition in the global health program where I shared Indian experiences on the
topic.
I was also part of a student seminar on trends and determinants of
neo-natal morality in Uganda where I helped the student with verbal feedback. Guidance
to Ph.D student Su Guobin at the Health Systems and Policy, Medicines, focusing antibiotics on his power point presentation.
I gave a seminar (during the India seminar) on
Migration, Vulnerability and Access to Maternal Healthcare and Child
Immunization in Mumbai, India